, SecurityFocus 2003-09-05
FBI agents armed with a federal arrest warrant out of New York were searching for Adrian Lamo Thursday, SecurityFocus has confirmed.
Expand all |
Post comment
FBI reportedly hunting Adrian Lamo
2003-09-05
Dr. Lin (1 replies)
Dr. Lin (1 replies)
FBI reportedly hunting Adrian Lamo
2003-09-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
New Instructions for Reporting Holes
2003-09-05
dyc0n (at) mchsi (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)
dyc0n (at) mchsi (dot) com [email concealed] (1 replies)
FBI reportedly hunting Adrian Lamo
2003-09-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
FBI reportedly hunting Adrian Lamo
2003-09-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
FBI reportedly hunting Adrian Lamo
2003-09-06
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
Adrian Lamo charged with computer crimes
2003-09-05
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)
THINK
2003-09-06
? (7 replies)
? (7 replies)
Dumb Americans
2003-09-06
Jean Pierre Rupp (1 replies)
Jean Pierre Rupp (1 replies)
Heh...he was in Sacramento 2 days ago.
2003-09-06
Ericka (1 replies)
Ericka (1 replies)
Heh...he was in Sacramento 2 days ago.
2003-09-07
Anonymous (1 replies)
Anonymous (1 replies)

This guy has been parading around like a little school girl. SecurityFocus or "Kevin", continues to "Focus" on this kid, eventhough my grandmother can hack better than him. Seriously editors at SecurityFocus.com, why are you posting articles about this guy?
Why not focus on the CCC, CDC, RFP, etc.? Individuals who have made a difference on the planet. Hell, even Fluffy Bunny would be a better subject. Not some kid using an internal proxy.
I think kinkos and everyone else should jump on the bandwagon and put him in a cell with bubba. But, the rest of the "hacker" world will more than likely start a "Free Lamo" campaign, which he does not deserve.
I would hate to see the cover of 2600 defiled with "Free Lamo" pictures.
[off soapbox]
Hack to secure, hack for fun.
Hack for fame, goodbye mum.
P.S.
[ reply ]
Link to this comment: http://www.securityfocus.com/comments/articles/6888/22037#22037